Reflections on Various Points

Bhagavat is one of the titles of the Buddha and often translated as “Lord.” This word has the connotation of sovereignty, authority, mastery. So who is the true master of our lives? Is it the Buddha? The historical Buddha is however, a teacher, and not a literal ruler or master, though in East Asian Buddhism the Buddha was considered to embody the three virtues of parent, teacher, and sovereign.

Now here is an interesting thing – one of the ways the Buddha taught his doctrine of non-self, was to point out that none of the things that make up our existence are really totally under our control. We cannot really control our body, because if we did we could live forever and would never feel hungry, thirsty, or tired, or so much as catch a cold. We cannot really control our feelings, because if we did then we would never feel pain and we could cause our pleasant feelings to last forever. We cannot really control our perceptions, because if we did we would never have to perceive unpleasant people, places, events, feelings or ideas. We cannot really control our mental formations, because if we could we would predetermine every thought and feeling that arose in us. Finally, even conscious awareness is not really in our control as we can lose it when we fall asleep, through accidents, and ultimately through death. So there doesn’t seem to be any real controller, master, or self as a fully in control determining agent. Therefore, the reality of our form, feelings, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness is that they are all non-self, and those five categories include everything that constitutes life as we experience it. So we seem to have a self, but we really don’t. We just have a conglomeration of factors that are provisionally designated and related to as a self. Developmental psychology and neurology corroborate this.

In Mahayana, however, the “self” is seemingly rehabilitated. Since all conditioned phenomena (such as form, feeling, percpetions, mental formations, and consciousness) are impure, ultimately unsatisfactory (i.e. suffering), impermanent, and non-self; then the unconditioned (whether called nirvana, the Dharma-body of the Buddha, or buddha-nature) must be the opposite – pure, blissful, eternal, and the true self. It is that which is authentic and not a falsely identified self, it is that which is truly in control. And would anyone dare say the Buddha is not in control of himself? Now nirvana is the impersonal way of relating to the unconditioned. The Dharma-body of the Buddha is to view all of reality as expressing buddhahood (or conversely, what is ultimately true about the Buddha is the ultimate truth about everyting), and buddha-nature is that aspect of the true reality of all things which is necessarily our truth as well and therefore something we can realize and actualize. As buddha-nature, it would seem that true selfhood or lordship is a secret and ineffable part of our lives (though not to be confused with all the conditions we falsely identify with, and not as something substantial that we can grasp).

Let us consider the Dharma-kaya for a moment. One way of personifying the Dharma-body, the universal aspect of buddhahood, in Mahayana Buddhism is as Mahavairocana, the Great Illuminator. In East Asian Buddhism this was translated with Chinese characters that mean Great Sun. In scientific terms all of our atoms came from the sun, and ultimately will return to the sun. In Buddhist terms, the Dharma-body is the truth about all causes and conditions, including those that directly and indirectly support what we experience for a time as our life.

This of course also means that as the personfication of the ultimate truth about causes and conditions, the Great Illuminator, is manifest in the fire of all generative creative power and the very air that nourishes all that breath. Here it is worth remembering that Shakyamuni Buddha pointed out that it is naive to measure life in terms of years and more realistic to measure it in terms of the moment it takes to inhale and exhale.

The Dharma-body is not only like the sun, or a generative organ, or fire, or air, but also like a womb, a great sea, and the earth. The Dharma-body when thought of in respect to the buddha-nature is called the tathāgata-garbha, which means “womb of the one who thus comes [from the realm of truth].” Enlightenment is sometimes compared to a great ocean which contains and reflects all things and therefore is called the Ocean Mirror Samadhi. When the Prince Siddhartha required a testimony before the demon Mara as to his worthiness to attain buddhahood, he touched the earth and it was the earth goddess Pṛthivī who provided that testimony, and the bodhisattva became Shakyamuni Buddha.

Because of the buddha-nature, even every potential life is a potential buddha. Soon after the Buddha attained his awakening he was protected from an unseasonal monsoon by the naga (sometimes called a dragon but really more like a giant supernatural cobra) Mucalinda, who coiled around him seven times and spread its hood over him. When the Buddha taught, his teaching was called the “lion’s roar.” When the causes and conditions that cause life to arise come together, it is this kind of power, like a serpent or a lion, that may be brought forth if it is only realized.

The Buddha’s teachings are for the purpose of realizing true knowledge (in Sanskrit jñāna, cognate with gnosis), of which there are many kinds such as the “knowledge and vision of things as they really are” or the “six higher knowledges.” In any case, it is the assembly (Sangha) of the noble ones who are able to accomplish their vows (or aspirations or pure will) and bring forth what is truly light, life, love, and liberty.

Those who follow their path to fruition, across all times and places, compose the noble Sangha (or assembly, note that the Greek word ekklesia translated as “church” also means “assembly”).

Everything that nourishes us, including but not limited to everything that we eat and drink, then becomes a part of our practice, and part of the expression of buddha-nature. In this way, as it is taught in East Asian Buddhism, even grasses and trees attain buddhahood.

It is therefore our aspiration to receive the supreme anointment or empowerment (S. abhiṣeka) from the buddhas so that we may accomplish our vow and also attain buddhahood.

Considering the teachings deeply, we should realize that we are one with all beings, because we are empty of any self-nature that would separate us from an other. And yet, provisionally we are an expression of a particular convergence of causes and conditions, embodying the all that is as a unique individual. At the same time, this unified convergence that embraces in one manner or another all time and space necessarily includes all that was, is, and is to come.

Many Buddhist chants begin and/or end with Om (or Aumgn). It signifies, among many other things, the beginning, middle, and end of a process, and by extension the silence or stillness in between. This is impermanence, what is impermanent is empty of self-nature, what is empty of self-nature is naturally at peace. May we realize this for ourselves and helps others to do as well.

Major Arcana of the Buddha's Life

The following is something that I have been contemplating since college (back in 1988 to be specific) but never got around to writing down. Well tonight I wrote it down. So here is how I see the life of the Buddha in accord with the Major Arcana of the Tarot:
Major Arcana of the Buddha
0 The Fool
Not yet awake, the bodhisattva Siddhartha seems strangely foolish in refusing to conform to the familiar patterns of daily sleepwalking.
I. The Magician
The seer Asita weeps to see the baby bodhisattva wishing there were enough magic to enable him to live to see the day of his awakening.
II. The High Priestess
Mother Maya passes beyond the veil of worlds, bereft of her son until the day the Buddha pierces that veil to impart the secrets of the Higher Dharma.
III. The Empress
Aunt Mahaprajapati raises the bodhisattva as her own, but because of him she will come to trade crown and silk for a shaven skull and patchwork rags.
IV. The Emperor
King Suddhodana looks with pride upon his son, an emperor in the making, but the day will come when he will sees his son begging in the streets.
V. The Hierophant
The Brahmin priests train the young prince in all the arts of science and theology, but in time he will see through their fraud and reject them.
VI. The Lovers
The bodhisattva weds the beautiful Princess Yashodhara and so comes to experience what it means to be a lover, husband, and father but this too he will forsake.
VII. The Chariot
Riding in his chariot, he sees what lies in wait for all beings – old age, sickness, and death. Seeing a renunciant he realizes what course to follow.
VIII. Strength
In order to find a way to end all suffering, the bodhisattva musters his strength and resolves to leave all luxuries and worldly indulgence behind.
IX. The Hermit
He leaves the palace in the dead of night, enters the forest, casts off his finery, cuts off his long black hair, and takes up the rags of a renunciant himself.
X. Wheel of Fortune
In the forests he wanders among those who have also left home seeking to break the bonds of samsara, the wheel of perpetual gain and loss, birth and death.
XI. Justice
Driving the wheel is the inexorable law of karma, our self-created destiny wherein there is no luck but only justice.
XII. The Hanged Man
Seeking to break through all this, the bodhisattva turned his life upside down, starving himself in order to pass beyond all craving and every bodily need.
XIII. Death
But in the end, he came no closer to the answer to suffering but found himself on the brink of death, and at that point he found a new life.
XIV. Temperance
The Middle Way became clear. The path between self-indulgence and self-denial lay in living simply and seeing more clearly and deeply than ever before.
XV. The Devil
Sitting beneath the Bodhi Tree he at last aroused the devil himself. The bodhisattva was ready to let go of the world, but Mara was not about to let him go.
XVI. The Tower
The bodhisattva saw through Mara’s tricks, the tricks of his own mind, and shattered the tower of ego with his insight. It would never again be rebuilt.
XVII. The Star
As the morning star arose the bodhisattva Siddhartha was no more. In his place was Shakyamuni Buddha, and the Buddha saw a world filled with buddhas.
XVIII. The Moon
Some were submerged in ages of delusion, sleepwalking in the dim moonlight of their dreams and nightmares, not suspecting that they too were buddhas.
XIX. The Sun
Others were emerging due to ages of merit, walking in the sunshine of compassionate action and wise consideration. Suspecting but not yet knowing the truth.
XX. Judgment
Brahma himself came down to plead the world’s case for the Buddha. And the Buddha decided in the world’s favor. He would share the Wonderful Dharma with all.
XXI. The World
From that day until this the world became the Buddha’s world, a Pure Land of Tranquil Light, seeming to burn but actually filled with radiance that has no beginning or end.

Other-power, self-power, and the Death of God in the Poseidon Adventure

Back in 2004 I rewatched the Poseidon Adventure with Yumi, and then wrote the following comments on the Nichiren Shu Yahoo group. Seeing as how a remake of the Poseidon Adventure is coming out this year I am reposting my comments regarding the original cinematic classic of American existentialism:

Hi all,
Just a week or so ago, my wife and I watched the Poseidon Adventure. Yumi loves disaster movies, suspense, thrillers, etc…and we had gone to see the Day After Tomorrow and were not so thrilled. I then told her about the Poseidon Adventure and she had to see it. Now that movie we both really liked.

Now I hadn’t seen that movie since I was little, and it was being shown on t.v. Seeing it again I was struck by one of the major themes of the movie – it was all about the Death of God theology which was popular back in the 60s and early 70s. Death of God theology was the work of liberal theologians who were trying to express Christianity in a world where Nietzche’s declaration that “God is dead” seemed to have captured the minds of many modern people (maybe more in Europe than in the States). The priest character played by Gene Hackman in the movie typifies (maybe even caricatures) this kind of theology. He preaches that God wants
people to get off their asses and save themselves, that God has no time to look out for everybody. Basically he is saying that as far as we should be concerned, God taught us to take care of ourselves and we should do so because God is not going to look out for us. The ship’s chaplain objects to this kind of teaching, insisting that it is not very comforting. Ultimately he objects because it is a teaching that is meaningful only to the strong and not to the weak.

The test of their respective theologies or approaches to life comes after the Poseidon has capsized and the two priests are trapped in the upside down ball room of the sinking ship with a few dozen passengers. Hackman’s character insists on taking those who are willing and trying to find a way out by going up to the bottom (now the top) of the ship. The chaplain insists on staying behind with the others and awaiting rescue (even though he concedes that this is highly unlikely – but he choses solidarity with those unable or unwilling to help themselves). When Hackman and his group barely escape the flooded ballroom and the others all die, it seems as though his view is vindicated in the movie. But is it? Not all those who follow Hackman make it (including Hackman himself but more on that later), whereas the chaplain may have shown a more self-
sacrificing compassion in staying with the others. But this dilemma is not solely a Christian one nor only a modern one. It is basically the old argument between salvation by faith or by works. In Japanese Buddhism it became an argument between tariki (salvation by the Other-power of the Buddha’s grace) and jiriki (salvation by the self-power of one’s own efforts to attain buddhahood). Typically Pure Land Buddhism is identified as tariki, wherein people recognize the inability of the self to undo selishness and instead rely entirely on Amitabha Buddha’s power to enable them to be reborn in the Pure Land. Zen is typically identified as self-power as Zen practitioners imitate the silent meditation of the Buddha to attain enlightenment through their own contemplations. But really, if you ever press a Zen or Pure Land practitioner on this point, they will conceded that ultimately there is neither self-power nor Other-power. There is just non-dual realization. Getting back to the Poseidon, how do things work out for Hackman’s priest character and those who follow him? One interesting twist is that Ernst Borgnine plays a cop named Mike Rogo who has a lot of trouble following Rev. Scott (Hackman). Ultimately he does, and in the end he overcomes his own despair and rage to do the right thing and follow through on Rev. Scott’s lead (and ultimate sacrifice). Which makes an interesting point – even the way of Death of God or self-power requires faith. So it is not as though faith vs. works is the same thing as faith vs. disbelief. The other twist is that there was something that Rev. Scott missed in preaching the save yourself version of Christianity. If one looks upon Jesus as an example to follow and not as someone who is going to save us in spite of oursleves, than that means taking up the cross oneself and not just saying that Jesus bore it for us. Rev. Scott seems to learn this at the very end when he rails against God for all the death and for not only being absent but for seemingly working against them. After this post-modern equivalent of “God why have you forsaken me?” he leaps to his death (and strangely his death is a combination of scalding, falling, fire, and drowning) in order to save the others. He himself, in rejecting grace has had to assume the cross himself but in doing so has provided the salvation he promised to the others. Not to leave out any angles, there are a lot of Jewish motifs in this film as well, and perhaps Rev. Scott is also a kind of Moses who brings his people almost to the promised land but is unable to enter himself. The final twist is that after all this, the survivers are still trapped within the upside down hull. They get out because a rescue party outside the hull hears them banging on the inside. Those on the outside cut their way in and then fly the survivers to safety. So ultimately, after exhausting their own efforts and coming to a dead end (the unbreached) hull – they must still call out to be saved by those on the other side. Self-power (which got them that far) has given way ultimately to Other-power. The Death of God has resolved itself into an imitation of God (Rev. Scott) and finally a calling out to God (knock and you shall receive – knocking on the hull). In terms of Buddhism, I have noticed that even the Pure Land founders like Shinran and Honen had first exhausted every self-powered effort to change themselves and had ultimately come to what they felt was a dead-end. It is not as though they copped out and found a loophole in the Law (Dharma) without trying. The Zen Masters, on the other hand, also seem to exhaust their efforts, and ultimately their enlightenment comes from (as Dogen put it) “dropping body and mind.” So even in the lives of the founders of the seemingly dichotomous paths of self-power and Other-power one sees the confluence of both. Nichiren also realized this and wrote that the Lotus Sutra seems to teach self-power but is not self-power because the self contains all the ten worlds and in fact all life and so is not just the self, and seems to teach Other-power but is not Other-power because the buddhas are all within ourselves and so not simply Other. The Poseidon Adventure, then, is like a metaphorical illustration of this confluence.


Note 4/19/06 I really hope the remake doesn’t suck, but I would be very surprised if the new version carries over the metaphorical and even parable like nature of the Gene Hackman version. If they just present it as a CGI enhanced remake of an adventure/disaster movie and miss the underlying theme of the Death of God, they will have missed the whole point of the first film. On the other hand Death of God is not really on the cultural agenda anymore, it’s more like God will be the Death of US, or at least “His” (sic) fanatical believers will be.


Namu Myoho Renge Kyo,
Ryuei